Persavya Request a fit review
Menu

Written audit deliverable

See the page evidence before deciding what to change.

The paid audit is a written decision document: annotated page evidence, a scorecard, buyer-friction notes, and an action order for the safest next edits.

Written Persavya landing page audit packet with annotated page and scorecard
Service context.The audit is scoped manually before payment and delivered as a written review, not a form funnel or instant score.
Clear action-order cards beside a landing page audit report
Action orderRecommendations are sequenced so the page owner knows what to fix first and what to validate later.
ScopeOne page first.The fit review checks whether the page has enough context for a useful written audit.
ProofEvidence before advice.Findings point back to visible page moments, not generic conversion rules.
BoundaryNo pressure path.Fit review comes before paid scope, and no guaranteed lift claim is made.

Landing page psychology audit

A written audit that shows what makes buyers hesitate.

Persavya reviews one landing page and its immediate next step, then returns a written report with visible evidence, risk labels, scorecard cues, and a safer action order.

Price bandUSD 497-1,500 after manual scope confirmation.
OutputWritten audit report with findings and action order.
BoundaryManual fit review comes first, with no promised lift.
What the report makes concreteThe offer is easier to evaluate when the buyer can see the report object before emailing.
Written audit reportFindings are tied to visible page evidence, not loose opinion.Deliverable proof
Scope before paymentFit, depth, price band, timeline, and inputs are confirmed before paid work.Manual first
Safer next stepRecommendations stay inside clarity, proof, CTA fit, and action order.No pressure tactics
Trust signal selectorChoose the trust lens before asking for a paid audit.

If a landing page feels almost credible but buyers still hesitate, Persavya separates the trust question before writing recommendations.

Selector only. Sample lens only, with no diagnosis, lift promise, or pressure tactic.
Start hereOperator proofUse when the buyer cannot quickly see who is responsible for the offer.
Audit looks for contact path, process cues, scope ownership, and credible limits.
Proof fitOffer evidenceUse when the claim is plausible but sample output or criteria feels too far away.
Audit looks for proof placement, report preview, examples, and claim-to-evidence distance.
Next stepDecision pathUse when the page asks for commitment before the buyer has enough context.
Audit looks for checklist, sample finding, manual fit review, or lower-friction sequencing.
BoundaryRisk boundaryUse when payment, promises, fit limits, or data handling are too implicit.
Audit looks for short boundary labels beside the action path.
The full matrix shows how weak trust signals become safer audit actions.
Pricing and scope cue

Choose the likely audit depth before sending a fit request.

The fit reply confirms scope and price before paid work; these bands help buyers decide whether the page is worth submitting.

Manual fit first. No payment, no scheduling widget, no promised lift.
Focus AuditOne-page decision risk reviewUSD 497-697

One page, one primary CTA, written decision-risk report.

Best when the page has one clear offer and a narrow hesitation point.
Full AuditPage plus next-step pathUSD 900-1,200

One page plus immediate next step, deeper proof and trust review.

Best when proof, CTA, and buyer risk all need sequencing.
Audit + Review CallWritten audit with bounded discussionUSD 1,200-1,500

Full audit plus bounded review call for action sequencing.

Best when a team needs to discuss what to fix first.
Price band is confirmed after fit review, not through payment.
Operator and service trustA manual audit service before any paid scope.

Persavya reviews one page context at a time, replies by email, and scopes paid work only after fit is clear.

Trust cue 01Human reviewThe review connects page evidence, offer context, and buyer decision risk before recommending edits.
No automated score-only output.
Trust cue 02Clear boundariesYou can start with a public page URL and short context; do not send passwords, customer records, or private analytics exports.
One page URL and context are enough to start.
Trust cue 03Scope before paymentYou get a fit reply before paid work, so page type, depth, price band, and limits are explicit.
Fit review comes before any paid scope.
Trust cue 04Written deliverableThe paid audit returns a written report with findings, risk labels, scorecard cues, and action order.
Advice stays evidence-first.

Sample report preview

What the paid audit actually hands back.

Illustrative pages only. The report format is shown so buyers can judge the deliverable before emailing a fit request.

Persavya Landing Page Psychology Audit Sample report packet
Page typePaid service landing page
Primary riskProof arrives after the claim
Review lensClarity, proof, friction, action order
BoundaryDecision support, not a promised lift
01

Executive snapshot

Main hesitation risk, why it matters, and the first fix to consider.

  • Offer category unclear above fold
  • Evidence appears after commitment CTA
  • Lower-friction next step recommended
02

Finding table

Each finding separates visible evidence, buyer risk, severity, and safer action.

EvidenceRiskActionClaim before proofTrust gapMove proof near claim
03

Scorecard

A compact read on clarity, proof, commitment match, and action sequence.

Clarity7
Proof5
Action6
04

Action order

The report ends with what to fix first, what to validate later, and what stays outside scope.

  1. Clarify the offer category.
  2. Place proof beside the claim.
  3. Reduce CTA commitment.
Commercial boundary: No client data, no diagnosis, no conversion guarantee, and no pressure-tactic recommendation. Request fit review by email

Deliverable proof

How visible page evidence becomes a report action.

A short map of the audit logic, so buyers can see the handoff from observation to written recommendation.

Page evidence
Risk label
Report object
Buyer use
First-screen ambiguityThe offer category, audience, or next step is not specific enough above the fold.
Clarity gapThe visitor has to infer whether the page is meant for them.
Executive snapshotPlain-language risk summary and first fix to consider.
Prioritize copyDecide what the first screen must answer before redesign work starts.
Proof appears lateClaims, outcomes, or credentials arrive before visible support.
Trust gapThe page asks for belief before showing enough evidence.
Finding tableEvidence, risk, severity, and recommendation kept in separate fields.
Move evidencePair proof, boundaries, or examples with the claim they support.
CTA asks too muchThe action has more commitment than the page has earned.
Friction mismatchThe next step feels heavier than the visitor’s confidence level.
Action sequenceWhat to fix first, what to test later, and what stays outside scope.
Lower risk pathChoose a safer email, fit-review, or proof route before asking for more commitment.
Boundary: sample logic only; the paid report is based on the submitted page and agreed scope. Email fit request

What you get

A concrete report, not a loose opinion.

The audit is built to brief a founder, marketer, designer, copywriter, agency, or internal team on what to fix first.

01Executive summaryMain decision risk, quick win, and the fix to prioritize.
02Annotated finding tableVisible issue, likely buyer impact, severity, and recommendation.
03First-screen reviewOffer category, fit cue, proof cue, scope cue, and CTA clarity.
04Proof and trust reviewWhere claims need evidence, examples, boundaries, or repositioning.
05CTA and next-step notesWhether the action matches visitor confidence and commitment level.
06Prioritized action orderWhat to fix first, what to validate later, and what is outside scope.

Commercial fit

Best when one page already has a real business job.

Not a redesign, legal review, tracking setup, or full copywriting package.

Good fit

Service, B2B, SaaS demo, quote, application, course, productized service, or paid-search landing pages.

Useful inputs

Page URL or screenshots, traffic source, offer summary, primary CTA, and the concern that triggered the review.

Wrong fit

Requests for pressure tactics, artificial urgency, full implementation, technical SEO, analytics setup, or specific performance promises.

Pricing frame

Choose the review depth after fit is confirmed.

These are scope bands for manual review. Final scope is confirmed by email before paid work starts.

Focused

Focus Audit

$497-$697

  • One page, one primary CTA.
  • Written report with top decision risks.
  • First-screen, proof, friction, and action-order notes.
Recommended

Full Audit

$900-$1,200

  • One page plus immediate next step.
  • Deeper proof, trust, CTA, form or booking-step review.
  • Prioritized implementation briefing.
Clarify

Audit + Review Call

$1,200-$1,500

  • Full audit plus bounded review call.
  • Priority clarification and action sequencing.
  • Good for teams handing work to specialists.

Proof path

See the method before asking for a review.

Use the public proof routes if you want to inspect how Persavya labels page evidence, decision friction, and safer recommendations.

Process

A manual fit review before paid work.

Send enough context to evaluate fit, not private customer records or login credentials.

Email contextPage URL, traffic source, offer summary, conversion goal, and main concern.
Fit checkPersavya confirms whether the audit is the right next step.
ScopeDepth, price band, timeline, and required inputs are agreed before paid work.
ReviewThe page and immediate next step are inspected through the decision-support lens.
ReportYou receive findings, severity, evidence level, and action order.

Trust and boundaries

Clearer persuasion without pressure.

Persavya is operated by Livesearch SRL. The review stays evidence-aware and buyer-agency first.

No dark patternsNo artificial urgency, hidden commitments, or manipulative scarcity.
No promised liftFindings are decision-support risks and hypotheses to validate.
Confidential contextSubmitted page and business notes are treated as review material.
Manual contactEmail-first path; no automated form, booking, or payment flow.
Final fit request Send a short email, not a form.

The buyer path stays manual: send enough context to confirm fit, then scope and price are confirmed before paid work.

Email Persavya
Include Four useful details
  • Landing page URL or screenshots
  • Traffic source and offer summary
  • Primary CTA or next step
  • Main concern to review
Reply confirms Whether this audit fits
  • Recommended audit depth
  • Likely price band
  • Useful inputs and limits
  • Next manual step
Do not send Keep private data out
  • No passwords or account access
  • Public page context only
  • Analytics export is optional
  • Keep payment details out of email
Manual fit first. Email-first fit review, no calendar gate, and no promised lift. Review fit details

Request the safest useful next step.

Email the page URL, traffic source, offer summary, and main concern. Scope is confirmed before paid work starts.

Persavya is a brand operated by Livesearch SRL. Public examples are illustrative and do not expose client data. Contact: contact@persavya.com.