Persavya Request a fit review
Menu

Marketing Psychology Audit

Audit process

Watch visible page evidence become a decision map.

The audit separates what is visible from what is assumed: proof placement, buyer hesitation, claim support, CTA risk, and the next safe edit.

Persavya work in progress audit desk with landing page annotations, scorecards, and decision map
Work in progress.A representative process view. The real audit is written from the page evidence supplied for review.
Persavya scope and confidentiality review materials for evidence-led audit method
Trust boundaryScope, confidentiality, and evidence-first review stay visible before payment or implementation.
EvidenceObservable first.Findings begin with visible page moments before advice is written.
FrictionDoubt is labeled.Buyer uncertainty is separated into clarity, proof, risk, and next-step issues.
ActionOrder matters.The report ranks safer edits before broader redesign work.
Marketing psychology audit

Persavya labels orientation, trust, proof, and next-step friction before bigger traffic, redesign, or copy decisions.

Scorecard first screen
EvidenceProof near the claim.
ClarityOffer and next step visible.
FrictionFit review before commitment.

Audit lab proof

Inspect the page evidence before the recommendation.

The audit starts with a concrete proof board: annotated evidence, buyer questions, risk labels, scorecard logic, and action order in one visual surface.

Illustrative Persavya annotated audit board with evidence labels, friction notes, buyer questions, behavior map, scorecard cues, and action order
Annotated audit-board preview. Shows how Persavya turns visible page moments into evidence, friction labels, buyer questions, and prioritized actions. Illustrative sample
EvidenceStart with what is visible.Claims, proof placement, CTA sequence, and trust cues are inspected before any recommendation is made.
FrictionSeparate doubt from opinion.Buyer questions are labeled as clarity, proof, trust, action, or boundary risks.
Action orderPrioritize the safest next edit.The report ranks what to fix first, what to validate later, and what stays outside scope.
Sample caveatIllustrative board only; not client evidence. Human reviewRecommendations are written from page evidence. Scope firstFit review comes before paid scope. No pressureNo artificial urgency, misleading scarcity, or promised lift.

Annotated landing-page audit board.

Sample board: friction markers, ethical labels, action cards, and safer next steps.

1Orientation gapBuyer sees value language before the offer category is concrete.
2Proof gapThe claim asks for confidence before a sample, scope note, or operator cue appears.
3CTA riskThe next step feels larger than the evidence currently supports.

Illustrative sample only: illustrative sample only, with no client data, invented testimonials, guarantees, analytics, or dark-pattern advice.

Ethical boundary: keep buyer agency visible.

Clarify fit, proof, scope, and next step. Keep informed choice visible.

Evidence boundary: label what is observed.

Tie findings to visible page moments. Treat them as hypotheses, not guaranteed outcomes.

1
Clarify the offer first.

Name category and buyer before commitment.

2
Move proof beside the claim.

Place sample output, evidence level, or scope notes beside the promise.

3
Match CTA to confidence.

Use checklist, sample, or fit review before paid steps.

Audit artifact path

What the audit turns into before advice.

A visitor can now see the working objects behind the service: page evidence, decision friction, proof placement, and a safer action order.

Evidence snapshotVisible page moments are captured before any interpretation.
Friction labelsFindings name the likely buyer question, not a hidden motive.
Proof placementClaims are matched with sample output, scope, or boundary notes.
Action orderRecommendations stay sequenced from clarity to proof to next step.

From page moment to decision risk.

Each finding is labeled as page moment, buyer question, evidence gap, or safer action.

Page moment
Claim appears before category clarity.

Value language appears before offer category.

Visitor question
What am I being asked to consider?

Orientation work blocks trust.

Evidence gap
Proof arrives after the first CTA.

Belief is requested before support.

Safer action
Name the offer and place proof near the claim.

Reduce uncertainty without pressure.

Evidence levels stay visible.

Recommendations stay labeled as observed risks and validation hypotheses.

Observed issue

Visible ask: understand, trust, or act.

Likely buyer impact

Likely hesitation for a qualified visitor.

Validation needed

Evidence to confirm later.

Trust signal matrixPersavya checks the evidence buyers use before they believe the page.

This view shows the audit lens behind trust recommendations: visible operator cues, offer evidence, decision path, and risk boundaries are separated before any action note is written.

Sample review lens only. Sample lens only, with no diagnosis, lift promise, or pressure tactic.
Signal 01Operator proofCan a buyer see who stands behind the offer before being asked to act?
Signal 02Offer evidenceDoes proof sit close enough to the claim to reduce interpretation work?
Signal 03Decision pathIs the next step scaled to the buyer’s current confidence level?
Signal 04Risk boundaryAre fit limits, scope, and what is not promised visible before payment?
Signal
Weak evidence pattern
Safer audit action
Operator proof
Credentials, process, or contact path appear only after the primary CTA.
Move operator cue and email-first fit path closer to the first claim.
Offer evidence
Benefit language appears before sample output, scope, or review criteria.
Pair claims with sample finding, scorecard, or report-preview evidence.
Decision path
The page jumps from interest to paid commitment without a lower-friction check.
Use checklist, sample finding, or manual fit review before paid scope.
Risk boundary
Limits, data handling, or non-guarantee language is hidden in dense copy.
Expose boundaries as short labels beside the action path.
Use this matrix to decide whether the audit should inspect trust, proof, or next-step friction first.
Trust cue and CTA pathUse the matrix without turning it into a promise.

The trust matrix is a sorting tool for safer audit scope, not a claim that a page will convert after edits.

Sample lensManual fit firstNo payment
Step 01Choose the weak trust signal.Start with operator proof, offer evidence, decision path, or risk boundary before asking for a recommendation.
Use selector
Step 02Check whether the audit is a fit.Persavya keeps the first step manual so scope, page type, and limits are clear before payment.
Check audit fit
Step 03Send the page context by email.Share the URL, goal, audience, and suspected trust issue. No upload form or account path is required.
Email context

Ethical audit standards before persuasion advice.

The service path now makes the review boundary visible: Persavya can improve clarity, proof order, and CTA fit without recommending pressure tactics, hidden urgency, or unsupported outcome claims.

Keep buyer agency visibleRecommendations should help a qualified visitor understand fit, tradeoffs, scope, and next step before commitment.
Separate observation from hypothesisFindings name the visible page moment first, then label the likely hesitation as something to validate.
Match CTA strength to earned trustUse sample, checklist, or fit review when the page has not yet earned a stronger commercial ask.

Fit, not-fit, and action order.

Use the audit when one commercial page needs clearer decision support.

Best fitLanding pages, paid traffic pages, service offers, demo or quote pages.Use fit review, then prioritize the earliest confidence blocker.
Not fitRequests for full redesign, implementation, legal review, or promised performance lift.Redirect to the right specialist or defer until scope is clear.
Action orderClarify offer category, move proof, reduce risky CTA asks, keep useful friction.Validate after the page has a clearer decision path.

Use the safest useful next step.

Start with fit review when one page has a real commercial goal and enough context to inspect without overcommitting.

Scorecard first screen
EvidenceProof near the claim.
ClarityOffer and next step visible.
FrictionFit review before commitment.
Persavya is operated by Livesearch SRL. Contact: contact@persavya.com. QA-passed routes: Audit method, Behavior map, Boundary, Checklist, and fit review. Legal: Privacy, Terms, Scope.

Scorecard row preview

Severity, trust, CTA, and ethics stay visible before the recommendation.

This sample rows format turns a page observation into a prioritized recommendation without claiming a proven conversion cause.

SeverityHigh
TrustGap
CTAClear
EthicsSafe
Sample scorecard, not diagnosis

Trust cue: this scorecard is a sample organizing frame, not a diagnosis or promised lift. The safe next step stays fit review first, then email follow-up only if scope is clear.

Sample scope onlyEmail-first pathManual fit review before scope
Teardown sample, not a diagnosis

Trust cue: the teardown sample should show page evidence, friction label, and boundary before any recommendation. The safe path stays fit review first, then email only if the scope is clear.

Sample scope onlyEmail-first pathManual fit review before scope
Teardown sample selectorChoose what the sample teardown should prove before asking for review.

The proof board below works best when the buyer can name the page question first. This selector turns the teardown into four concrete review lenses.

Sample selector only. No diagnosis, no growth forecast, no pressure tactic, and no purchase path.
Lens 01Evidence gapUse when the page makes a claim before the buyer can inspect the proof.
Review looks for sample output, source cue, proof placement, and claim distance.
Lens 02Friction labelUse when the page asks for a next step before the cost of that step feels clear.
Review looks for choice cost, unclear sequence, vague CTA copy, and confidence mismatch.
Lens 03Boundary noteUse when scope, exclusions, data handling, or non-guarantees are too hidden.
Review looks for visible limits that protect buyer agency before commitment.
Lens 04Action orderUse when recommendations need to be sequenced by risk, clarity, and effort.
Review looks for what should be fixed first, deferred, or left unchanged.
The selector should point to a manual fit check, not a form, payment, or guaranteed result.

Teardown sample proof board

A sample teardown should make the evidence visible before interpretation. This board shows the kind of page cue, friction label, boundary, and safer next step a Persavya review would document.

Sample teardown, not a diagnosis
Observed page evidence
CTA and proof gap
Evidence cueClaim appears before proof

Move the proof object closer to the promise so the visitor can inspect why the next step is reasonable.

Friction labelChoice cost is unclear

Replace vague action copy with a fit-check path that explains scope, timing, and manual review.

Boundary noteNo manipulation shortcut

The recommendation should preserve buyer agency and avoid pressure, scarcity, or guaranteed outcome framing.

Proof labels and captions compressed for scan speed.
Sample audit scorecard

A compact view of what gets scored before advice.

The scorecard turns a page review into visible priorities: evidence strength, message clarity, decision friction, and claim risk. It is a sample structure, not a diagnosis or guaranteed outcome.

EvidenceCan the claim be checked on-page without trust leaps?
ClarityDoes the visitor understand the offer and next step fast?
FrictionWhich asks should be reduced, sequenced, or explained?
Proof placementMove concrete proof closer to the first decision instead of adding longer explanation.
Safe CTA pathRoute uncertain visitors to fit review or email, not payment, booking, or capture.
Boundary noteFlag sample-only findings and avoid revenue, conversion, or behavior guarantees.
Output style: short scorecard, visible recommendation order, and clear caveats before any implementation suggestion.
Scorecard selector

Pick the audit lens before adding more copy.

A compact card rail shows how Persavya sorts a page issue into a practical review path: evidence, clarity, or friction. Each option stays sample-only and routes to fit review before any paid implementation.

Use this as a routing aid, not a diagnosis, prediction, or promised outcome.
Evidence checkTrust first

Best when the page asks for belief before showing proof.

  • Claim support near the decision
  • Proof object or caveat placement
  • Unsafe authority or guarantee scan
OutputProof order notes
Clarity passOffer first

Best when visitors can see the page but not the offer.

  • First-screen message check
  • Primary and secondary CTA fit
  • Shorter explanation path
OutputRewrite targets
Friction mapPath first

Best when the next step feels too early, vague, or risky.

  • Decision sequence review
  • Payment, form, or booking boundary
  • Safer fit-review path
OutputAction order
Boundary: sample selector only. No lift promise, revenue promise, behavioral manipulation, payment, booking, or capture path is introduced.
Friction map selectorChoose the hesitation pattern before reading the friction map.

Persavya separates the page problem before recommending copy, proof, or CTA changes.

Selector only. Sample lens only, with no diagnosis, lift promise, or pressure tactic.
Pattern 01Attention gapUse when visitors cannot place the offer quickly.
Review looks for first-screen category, language, and claim order.
Pattern 02Proof gapUse when the claim appears before proof.
Review looks for proof object, sample output, and boundary placement.
Pattern 03Action gapUse when the next step feels too early.
Review looks for CTA sequence, manual fit review, and lower-friction path.
Pattern 04Sequence gapUse when the page has all pieces but order creates hesitation.
Review looks for what to move first, defer, or leave unchanged.
Use this selector when the page feels informative but the next step still feels early, vague, or risky.
Sample friction map

A decision map before recommendations.

This map shows how Persavya labels hesitation points before suggesting copy, proof, or CTA changes. It maps observable page friction; it is not a diagnosis or promised lift.

AttentionVisitor sees the offer but cannot place the page category fast.Clarify
ProofClaim appears before visible evidence, sample output, or boundary note.Move proof
ActionNext step asks too much before fit, scope, or manual review is clear.Sequence
Question gapWhat does the buyer need to know before the claim feels earned?
Trust gapWhich proof object should sit beside the promise instead of below the fold?
Next-step gapShould the safer path be fit review, email, checklist, or a same-page proof anchor?
Boundary: the map supports clearer buyer decisions without adding dark-pattern pressure, fake authority, purchase paths, booking paths, forms, analytics, or guaranteed conversion claims.
Trust cue and CTA pathUse the friction map without turning hesitation into pressure.

The map is a way to name buyer uncertainty before changing copy, proof, or CTA order. It is not a conversion promise.

Sample mapManual fit firstNo payment
Step 01Pick the hesitation pattern.Start from attention, proof, action, or sequence gap before asking for a recommendation.
Use selector
Step 02Check whether the audit is a fit.Persavya keeps the first step manual so page type, scope, and limits are clear before payment.
Check friction-map fit
Step 03Send page context by email.Share the URL, offer, audience, and suspected hesitation point. No upload form or account path is required.
Email context
Proof pathway across the audit surfaces.Move from method, to sample evidence, to checklist, then fit review through public proof routes and email-first review.
Public proof routes
Email-first boundary: scope and payment come after manual fit confirmation.contact@persavya.com